Home › Forums › General Discussion › Can someone explain this to me?
- This topic has 11 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 11 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
30/01/2006 at 4:36 pm #5001AnonymousInactive
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4661442.stm
Okay, completely unrelated to games…
Story about Michael Barrymore. Met the dead guy’s father who said he doesn’t believe Barrymore had anything to do with his death. However, his solicitor is bringing MB to court and it says “Mr Bennett stressed the action was “my own initiative” and that he was not representing the Lubbock family.” The solicitor is bringing him to court and not the family. How can a solicitor bring a civil case to court without backing from the family? Any law people out there? -
30/01/2006 at 6:20 pm #29182AnonymousInactive
Any solicitor or barrister can ask the court to grant a private prosecution in exceptional circumstances. The backing of the family is not necessary. They have refused to put forward a case, but this very serious issue still remains unresolved.
I think it’ll be turfed out before long. I think one of the Michael Jackson cases could have been private prosecution.
-
30/01/2006 at 6:36 pm #29184AnonymousInactive
So who pays for the fees?
-
30/01/2006 at 7:31 pm #29187AnonymousInactive
Not a clue! Steph is the legal eagle around these parts, he should know.
I think that there may be no compensation involved if the solicitor wins. It’ll just bring closure to the matter. Or perhaps the family may wish to use the outcome to take it to the criminal court.
-
31/01/2006 at 9:40 am #29213AnonymousInactive
And should the solicitor win the case where do the damages go if they’re not fighting the case for anyone?? Lawyers are just pure strange…
-
31/01/2006 at 1:07 pm #29220AnonymousInactive
Might I humbly precise that I am not a lawyer/solicitor? :lol:
In other words – not a clue :twisted:
-
31/01/2006 at 1:43 pm #29222AnonymousInactive
Yeah Ronny, implying someone is a lawyer….thats pretty low :P
-
31/01/2006 at 3:06 pm #29225AnonymousInactive
Apologies. It’s almost as bad as calling someone a code monkey. Now that’s low! :P
-
31/01/2006 at 3:16 pm #29227AnonymousInactive
At least you still have your dignity if you are a monkey…
-
31/01/2006 at 4:33 pm #29228AnonymousInactive
I’ve explained this before to you guys… :roll:
To solicitors, we IP types -particularly the patent IP types- are considered to be engineers.
And to engineers, we IP types are considered to be lawyers/solicitors.
(you an engineer, omen? :lol: )
Us IP types? We don’t care for the affiliation, we just laugh all the way to the bank :twisted:
-
31/01/2006 at 4:39 pm #29230AnonymousInactive
(you an engineer, omen? ) [/quote:8126b49454]
Nope, I’m a code monkey :D -
31/01/2006 at 4:46 pm #29231AnonymousInactive
same-o, same-o :wink:
-
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘General Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.